refactor(tests): use consistent naming in table tests with the map pattern

[mwbrooks]

Summary

Related to PR #315

This pull request standardizes the naming convention in table-driven tests that use the map pattern across the codebase.

• Standardizes on name and tc (test case) in all table-driven tests using the slice pattern
• Some common patterns you'll see in this PR:
  • for name, tt := range → for name, tc := range
  • for ttName, tt := range → for name, tc := range
  • for name, test := range → for name, tc := range
  • for name, s := range → for name, tc := range

Motivation

This is the second step in refactoring all of our Table Tests to use a consistent style. It creates consistent naming between our Slice and Map Pattern table tests.

The next PR will refactor all simple Slice Pattern tests to Map Pattern.

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 64.63%. Comparing base (14fe964) to head (7fcc775).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #316   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.62%   64.63%           
=======================================
  Files         212      212           
  Lines       17755    17755           
=======================================
+ Hits        11475    11476    +1     
  Misses       5205     5205           
+ Partials     1075     1074    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks LGTM! The tests are passing still so let's merge this 🧪 ✨

[mwbrooks]

@zimeg Thanks for tackling this monster number of line changes! 😬 🙇🏻 🙇🏻‍♂️ 🙇🏻‍♀️