PEP 781: Make TYPE_CHECKING a built-in constant

.github/CODEOWNERS

@@ -659,6 +659,8 @@ peps/pep-0777.rst  @warsaw
 # ...
 peps/pep-0779.rst  @Yhg1s @colesbury @mpage
 # ...
+peps/pep-0781.rst  @methane
+# ...
 peps/pep-0789.rst  @njsmith
 # ...
 peps/pep-0801.rst  @warsaw

peps/pep-0781.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+PEP: 781
+Title: Make ``TYPE_CHECKING`` a built-in constant
+Author: Inada Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>
+Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/85728
+Status: Draft
+Type: Standards Track
+Topic: Typing
+Created: 24-Mar-2025
+Python-Version: 3.14
+Post-History: `11-Jan-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/76766>`__,
+              `24-Mar-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/85728>`__,
+
+
+Abstract
+========
+
+This PEP proposes adding a new built-in variable, :data:`!TYPE_CHECKING`, to
+improve the experience of writing Python code with type annotations. It is
+evaluated as ``True`` when the code is being analyzed by a static type checker,
+and as ``False`` during normal runtime execution. Unlike
+:data:`typing.TYPE_CHECKING`, which this variable replaces, it does not require
+an import statement.
+
+
+Motivation
+==========
+
+Type annotations were defined for Python by :pep:`484`, and have enjoyed
+widespread adoption. A challenge with fully-annotated code is that many
+more imports are required in order to bring the relevant name into scope,
+potentially causing import cycles without careful design. This has been
+recognized by :pep:`563` and later :pep:`649`, which introduce two different
+mechanisms for deferred evaluation of type annotations. As PEP 563 notes,
+"type hints are ... not computationally free". The :data:`typing.TYPE_CHECKING`
+constant was thus introduced__, initially to aid in breaking cyclic imports.
+
+__ https://github.com/python/typing/issues/230
+
+In situations where startup time is critical, such as command-line interfaces,
+applications, or core libraries, programmers may place all import statements
+not required for runtime execution within a 'TYPE_CHECKING block', or even
+defer certain imports to within functions. The ``typing`` module itself though
+can take as much as 10ms to import, longer than Python takes to initialize.
+The time taken to import the ``typing`` module clearly cannot be ignored.
+
+To avoid importing ``TYPE_CHECKING`` from ``typing``, developers currently
+define a module-level variable such as ``TYPE_CHECKING = False`` or use code
+like ``if False:  # TYPE_CHECKING``. Providing a standard method will allow
+many tools to implement the same behavior consistently. It will also allow
+third-party tools in the ecosystem to standardize on a single behavior
+with guaranteed semantics, as for example some static type checkers currently
+do not permit local constants, only recognizing ``typing.TYPE_CHECKING``.
+
+
+Specification
+=============
+
+``TYPE_CHECKING`` is a built-in constant and its value is ``False``.
+Unlike ``True``, ``False``, ``None``, and ``__debug__``, ``TYPE_CHECKING`` is
+not a real constant; assigning to it will not raise a ``SyntaxError``.
+
+Static type checkers must treat ``TYPE_CHECKING`` as ``True``, similar to
+:data:`typing.TYPE_CHECKING`.
+
+If this PEP is accepted, the new ``TYPE_CHECKING`` constant will be
+the preferred approach, instead of the existing ``typing.TYPE_CHECKING``.
+However, ``typing.TYPE_CHECKING`` will not be deprecated in the foreseeable
+future.
+
+
+Backwards Compatibility
+=======================
+
+Since ``TYPE_CHECKING`` doesn't prohibit assignment, existing code using
+``TYPE_CHECKING`` will continue to work.
+
+.. code-block:: python
+
+   # This code will continue to work
+   TYPE_CHECKING = False
+   from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
+
+
+User can remove the assignment to ``TYPE_CHECKING`` after they stop using
+Python 3.13 or older versions.
+
+
+How to Teach This
+=================
+
+* Use ``if TYPE_CHECKING:`` for skipping type-checking code at runtime.
+* Use ``from typing import TYPE_CHECKING`` to support Python versions before
+  3.14.
+* Workarounds like ``TYPE_CHECKING = False`` or ``if False:  # TYPE_CHECKING``
+  will continue to work, but are not recommended.
+
+
+Reference Implementation
+========================
+
+* `python/cpython#131793 <https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/131793>`__
+
+
+Rejected Ideas
+==============
+
+Eliminate type-checking-only code
+---------------------------------
+
+It is considered to add real constant named ``__type_checking__``
+to eliminate type-checking-only code at compile time.
+
+However, adding real constant to language increase complexity of the language.
+Benefit from eliminating type-checking-only code is estimated to be not enough
+to justify the complexity.
+
+
+Copyright
+=========
+
+This document is placed in the public domain or under the
+CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.