-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
CI: Update / Remove Workflows to Accommodate CalVer #44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
b033945
ca3bd7c
7d6a557
74182f4
c2436bb
88559f9
05bc8b9
fe30ae5
39b7ca0
150ed81
aa6f9b9
92f4451
f2ffc95
0da67af
a55ac2d
58aa07a
dc05c48
95679c8
2cb25b8
9fc3f86
5f72b1f
c7ce722
42e3d0f
1ea8fcc
6d0781c
1d34311
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| - color: FF5959 | ||
| description: Breaking changes which must be reviewed before being included in the monthly release. | ||
| name: 'calver: breaking' | ||
| - color: AB9EF7 | ||
| description: Changes which should be included in the monthly release. | ||
| name: 'calver: monthly' | ||
| - color: 9EC9F7 | ||
| description: Non-breaking changes which should be included in a patch release. | ||
| name: 'calver: patch' |
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. suggestion: I would suggest to separate the two things handled in this PR: Cleanup workflows that might not be used anymore. This would help getting the support for calver over the line, while we can discuss if the workflows you would like to clean up really can be removed already.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah this one was only used by Snowflake - I think depending on what @hovaesco says on this PR and the other PR I think you're right - it might be worth moving this change out and cleaning up the workflows another time just so we can get these changes over the line! Same with |
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: For a (separate) cleanup PR, would it make sense to also remove the semver label definition then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a comment on the
localstack-corePR!TL;DR I thought it'd be good to keep these since not all our repositories use CalVer and some use SemVer which may want to sync tags (in practice and in hindsight the only repos which do use a labels sync are moving to CalVer but in the future if more repos sync their labels they can opt into using our existing SemVer ones!)