Skip to content

Conversation

@glensc
Copy link
Owner

@glensc glensc commented Nov 30, 2022

No description provided.

@glensc glensc self-assigned this Nov 30, 2022
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named "Pull Request Docs Check" has been introduced to the repository. This workflow is triggered on pull requests and pushes to the main branch when changes are made to the workflow file or any files within the docs directory. It runs on an Ubuntu 22.04 environment and includes steps for checking out the code, setting up Python, installing dependencies, and building documentation. Additionally, modifications were made to the test workflow to ignore specific paths, refining the conditions under which tests are executed.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml New workflow added for documentation build verification
.github/workflows/test.yml Added paths-ignore directives to exclude certain files from triggering tests

Poem

🐰 Docs are building, workflows align
Code and documentation intertwine
GitHub Actions, a rabbit's delight
Checking changes with all its might
Pull requests dance, no errors in sight! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml (2)

21-24: Update Python setup action version

The workflow uses an older version of setup-python action.

- uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+ uses: actions/setup-python@v5
  with:
    python-version: ${{ env.DEFAULT_PYTHON }}
+   cache: pip  # Enable pip caching for faster builds
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

22-22: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


28-32: Add error handling for version extraction

The version extraction process needs error handling in case there are no tags.

- # Setup version
- version=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)
- echo "__version__ = '$version'" > trakt/__version__.py
- cat trakt/__version__.py
- python -c "from trakt import __version__; print(__version__)"
+ # Setup version
+ if ! version=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null); then
+   version="0.0.0-dev"
+   echo "No git tags found, using default version: $version"
+ fi
+ echo "__version__ = '$version'" > trakt/__version__.py
+ cat trakt/__version__.py
+ python -c "from trakt import __version__; print(__version__)"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43e281f and 2320aae911583e4b8528c94ca4251cfcf60ff3af.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/docs-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml

20-20: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


22-22: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

5-8: Verify documentation and test independence

The paths-ignore configuration looks good, but please verify that documentation changes cannot affect tests. For example:

  • Are there any executable code examples in docs that should be tested?
  • Is documentation generated from docstrings that are used in tests?

Let's check for potential dependencies:

Also applies to: 10-13

✅ Verification successful

Documentation changes can be safely ignored for tests

The paths-ignore configuration is correct. Analysis shows:

  • Documentation uses standard Sphinx setup without executable examples
  • No integration between documentation and test suite
  • No docstring-based documentation that could affect tests
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for executable code in docs and doctest usage
rg -l ".. code-block::" docs/ || true
rg -l "doctest" . || true

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Makefile and look for additional patterns
cat docs/Makefile
echo "---"
# Look for Python test files in docs
fd -e py . docs/
echo "---"
# Search for documentation generation tools
rg -l "sphinx|pdoc|doxygen|jsdoc|typedoc" . || true

Length of output: 6934

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml (3)

1-1: Consider standardizing the workflow name

For consistency with GitHub's naming conventions, consider using "Docs" or "Documentation" instead of "Pull Request Docs Check" since the workflow runs on both PRs and pushes.

-name: "Pull Request Docs Check"
+name: "Documentation"

15-16: Consider upgrading to Python 3.11

Python 3.11 is the latest stable version with significant performance improvements. Consider upgrading unless there are specific compatibility requirements with 3.10.

-  DEFAULT_PYTHON: "3.10"
+  DEFAULT_PYTHON: "3.11"

41-41: Add error handling for docs build

The make docs command should fail the workflow if documentation build fails. Consider adding error handling and artifact upload.

-          make docs
+          make docs || {
+            echo "::error::Documentation build failed"
+            exit 1
+          }
+      - name: Upload documentation
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        with:
+          name: documentation
+          path: docs/_build/
+          if-no-files-found: error
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2320aae911583e4b8528c94ca4251cfcf60ff3af and cf1cecf90fa4d564a87b88c7cb31c1e71fa49f5c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/docs-build.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml

23-23: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


25-25: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml (2)

22-23: Update checkout configuration for version extraction

Since the workflow extracts version from git tags, we need to ensure tags are fetched. Also, update to the latest version as recommended by actionlint.

- uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ uses: actions/checkout@v4
+ with:
+   fetch-depth: 0  # Fetch all history and tags
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

23-23: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


38-41: Improve dependency installation reliability

The current approach has several potential issues:

  1. Direct apt install of sphinx might get an outdated version
  2. Missing pip install of sphinx and its dependencies
  3. No version pinning for sphinx
- # Install deps and build docs
- pip install -r requirements.txt
- sudo apt install sphinx
+ # Install deps and build docs
+ python -m pip install --upgrade pip
+ python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
+ python -m pip install 'sphinx>=7.1.0'  # Pin to a specific version

@glensc glensc marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 21:40
@glensc glensc force-pushed the docs-build-check branch 2 times, most recently from 7f140f9 to 97b6a80 Compare January 8, 2025 22:13
@glensc
Copy link
Owner Author

glensc commented Jan 8, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml (3)

22-29: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update GitHub Actions to latest versions

Both actions need version updates:

-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4

-        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

23-23: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


27-27: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


34-37: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve version extraction error handling

The current version extraction could fail if no tags exist. Consider adding a fallback:

-          version=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0) || exit 1
+          version=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || echo "dev")

39-42: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve dependency installation process

The current approach needs improvement:

  1. Direct apt install of sphinx might get an outdated version
  2. Missing pip install of sphinx and its dependencies
  3. No version pinning for sphinx
-          pip install -r requirements.txt
-          sudo apt install sphinx
+          python -m pip install --upgrade pip
+          python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
+          python -m pip install 'sphinx>=7.1.0'
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml (2)

1-17: Consider workflow naming convention and Python version updates

  1. Consider renaming the workflow to be more consistent with CI naming conventions:
-name: "Pull Request Docs Check"
+name: "docs"
  1. Consider upgrading to Python 3.11 (latest LTS) for better performance and features:
-  DEFAULT_PYTHON: "3.10"
+  DEFAULT_PYTHON: "3.11"

42-42: Add error handling for documentation build

The make docs command should include error handling and verbose output for better debugging:

-          make docs
+          make docs SPHINXOPTS="-W --keep-going -n"

The added options will:

  • -W: Turn warnings into errors
  • --keep-going: Don't stop on first error
  • -n: Run in nit-picky mode
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf1cecf90fa4d564a87b88c7cb31c1e71fa49f5c and 6e1f012.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/docs-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/docs-build.yml

23-23: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


27-27: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

@glensc glensc merged commit b2a2f3e into main Jan 9, 2025
9 checks passed
@glensc glensc deleted the docs-build-check branch January 9, 2025 23:38
@glensc glensc mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2025
glensc added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2025
Take recommendations from coderabbit to accoiunt:
- #12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants