Skip to content

Conversation

@RolandJentschETAS
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Description

remove double link (is already linked from req to comp)

🚨 Impact Analysis

  • This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
  • This change does not violate any design decisions
  • Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

  • Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
  • Added/updated tests to cover the changes
  • Followed project coding standards and guidelines

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: fea92ff4-bf42-4a21-ad5f-7b3b3c9804f1
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (71 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (126 packages loaded, 1816 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (129 packages loaded, 2435 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (135 packages loaded, 2485 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //src:license-check (137 packages loaded, 4500 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //src:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 12.052s, Critical Path: 0.34s
INFO: 13 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check src/formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

# req-Id: tool_req__docs_common_attr_status
status: ^(valid|invalid)$
optional_links:
fulfils: comp_req
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this picture is still correct, then a 'includes' where 'comp' is allowed is missing here too right?
Or is that the 'consists_of' link here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@RolandJentschETAS RolandJentschETAS Jan 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is the "consists_of". The picture in the process have to be adopted. There is a parallel PR in the process area for this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

picture was updated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Draft

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants