⚡️ Speed up method JfrProfile.get_method_ranking by 73% in PR #1874 (java-tracer)#1877
⚡️ Speed up method JfrProfile.get_method_ranking by 73% in PR #1874 (java-tracer)#1877codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intojava-tracerfrom
JfrProfile.get_method_ranking by 73% in PR #1874 (java-tracer)#1877Conversation
The optimization eliminates redundant dictionary lookups and string operations by hoisting the percentage multiplier out of the loop, replacing the lambda sort key with `operator.itemgetter(1)`, and consolidating `_method_info.get()` calls that previously checked the same key twice for `class_name` and `method_name`. Line profiler data shows sorting time dropped from 3.86 µs to 1.92 µs (50% reduction) by using `itemgetter`, and the `rsplit(".", 1)` fallback is now invoked only when a field is genuinely missing rather than on every iteration. These changes cut per-method processing from ~769 ns to ~542 ns on average, yielding a 73% speedup (4.38 ms → 2.53 ms) across workloads ranging from small rankings to 1000-method profiles.
|
CI failures are pre-existing on the base branch (not caused by this PR): unit-tests (all platforms) fail due to test_git_utils tests that test old language-filtering behavior — these will be fixed once PR #1878 merges. Leaving open for merge once base branch CI is fixed. |
|
The merge conflict was introduced by #1876 being merged moments ago. Both PRs add an import to jfr_parser.py, causing a trivial conflict. The Windows unit test failure is the pre-existing flaky timing test mentioned in the base PR description. Please rebase onto java-tracer to resolve. |
|
CI failures are pre-existing on the base branch (not caused by this PR): |
|
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1874
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
java-tracer.📄 73% (0.73x) speedup for
JfrProfile.get_method_rankingincodeflash/languages/java/jfr_parser.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.38 milliseconds→2.53 milliseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization eliminates redundant dictionary lookups and string operations by hoisting the percentage multiplier out of the loop, replacing the lambda sort key with
operator.itemgetter(1), and consolidating_method_info.get()calls that previously checked the same key twice forclass_nameandmethod_name. Line profiler data shows sorting time dropped from 3.86 µs to 1.92 µs (50% reduction) by usingitemgetter, and thersplit(".", 1)fallback is now invoked only when a field is genuinely missing rather than on every iteration. These changes cut per-method processing from ~769 ns to ~542 ns on average, yielding a 73% speedup (4.38 ms → 2.53 ms) across workloads ranging from small rankings to 1000-method profiles.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1874-2026-03-19T09.01.32and push.