refactor: drop stale Phase X.Y doc markers and one inline color branch#1443
Conversation
This was referenced May 19, 2026
Member
Author
|
This pull request is part of a Mergify stack:
|
This was referenced May 19, 2026
This was referenced May 19, 2026
Contributor
Merge ProtectionsYour pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid. 🔴 ⛓️ Depends-On RequirementsWaiting for
This rule is failing.Requirement based on the presence of
🔴 👀 Review RequirementsWaiting for
This rule is failing.
🔴 🔎 ReviewsWaiting for
This rule is failing.
🟢 🤖 Continuous IntegrationWonderful, this rule succeeded.
🟢 Enforce conventional commitWonderful, this rule succeeded.Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/
🟢 📕 PR descriptionWonderful, this rule succeeded.
|
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
329d5d9 to
2ee7f8e
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
9484593 to
3e6ba1c
Compare
Member
Author
Revision history
|
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
2ee7f8e to
e195107
Compare
This was referenced May 19, 2026
sileht
previously approved these changes
May 20, 2026
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
6d57a9c to
a946696
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
e195107 to
1a26a25
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
a946696 to
fcfd504
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
1a26a25 to
30e29f7
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
30e29f7 to
6629220
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
fcfd504 to
2b55249
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
2b55249 to
b12bb5c
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
6629220 to
1472a2e
Compare
Two unrelated polish items grouped because each is too small for
its own commit:
1. Module docs across `mergify-core`, `mergify-config`,
`mergify-queue`, `mergify-cli`, and `mergify-py-shim` were
pinned to the phase numbering the port plan used during
bootstrapping ("Phase 1.2 populates…", "Phase 1.7 ports…",
"Phase 6 deletes…"). Those references no longer aid the reader
and contradict the project rule about not embedding phase
numbers in long-lived artifacts — rewrite each docstring to
describe the module's *current* shape and let `git log`
reconstruct the trajectory if anyone needs it.
2. `freeze/list.rs::write_row` still had an `if theme.enabled { …
theme.fg(c) } else { Style::new() }` branch around the Status
cell — the same redundant indirection the earlier dedup pass
removed elsewhere. `Theme::fg` already collapses to
`Style::new()` when colors are disabled, so the outer branch
is pure noise. Drop it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I477e098578452de9e955119241ce7b92c0641b22
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/consolidate-ci-env-scrubber-shared-testing-module--cd8c8441
branch
from
b12bb5c to
8b64b4d
Compare
jd
force-pushed
the
devs/jd/worktree-rust-port/drop-stale-phase-x-y-doc-markers-one-inline-color--477e0985
branch
from
1472a2e to
69759d0
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two unrelated polish items grouped because each is too small for
its own commit:
Module docs across
mergify-core,mergify-config,mergify-queue,mergify-cli, andmergify-py-shimwerepinned to the phase numbering the port plan used during
bootstrapping ("Phase 1.2 populates…", "Phase 1.7 ports…",
"Phase 6 deletes…"). Those references no longer aid the reader
and contradict the project rule about not embedding phase
numbers in long-lived artifacts — rewrite each docstring to
describe the module's current shape and let
git logreconstruct the trajectory if anyone needs it.
freeze/list.rs::write_rowstill had anif theme.enabled { … theme.fg(c) } else { Style::new() }branch around the Statuscell — the same redundant indirection the earlier dedup pass
removed elsewhere.
Theme::fgalready collapses toStyle::new()when colors are disabled, so the outer branchis pure noise. Drop it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 noreply@anthropic.com
Depends-On: #1442