-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 390
add serializable protocol #3799
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
d-v-b
wants to merge
2
commits into
zarr-developers:main
Choose a base branch
from
d-v-b:feat/serializable-protocol
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+406
−67
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
| from typing import Protocol, Self, TypeVar | ||
|
|
||
| T_co = TypeVar("T_co", covariant=True) | ||
| T_contra = TypeVar("T_contra", contravariant=True) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class JSONSerializable(Protocol[T_co, T_contra]): | ||
| @classmethod | ||
| def from_json(cls, obj: T_contra) -> Self: | ||
| """ | ||
| Deserialize from an instance of T_contra. | ||
| """ | ||
| ... | ||
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def try_from_json(cls, obj: object) -> Self: | ||
| """ | ||
| Deserialize from an unknown object. Details of any | ||
| deserialization failure should be conveyed via an exception. | ||
| """ | ||
| ... | ||
|
|
||
| def to_json(self) -> T_co: | ||
| """ | ||
| Serialize to JSON. | ||
| """ | ||
| ... | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,13 +1,15 @@ | ||
| from __future__ import annotations | ||
|
|
||
| from typing import TYPE_CHECKING | ||
| from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any | ||
|
|
||
| if TYPE_CHECKING: | ||
| from collections.abc import Mapping | ||
|
|
||
| from zarr.core.common import JSON | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def parse_attributes(data: dict[str, JSON] | None) -> dict[str, JSON]: | ||
| def parse_attributes(data: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, JSON]: | ||
| if data is None: | ||
| return {} | ||
|
|
||
| return data | ||
| return dict(data) |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as discussed on zulip, I'm don't find
try_from_jsonto be intuitiveThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think I'm a fan of
from_object, because the term "object" is unfortunately overloaded in python. People might think "object" means "a class instance" as opposed to "the base typeobject". I'd like to get a range of opinions here. cc @zarr-developers/python-core-devsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
from_json_checkedcould convey that there's a type checking step...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we require typed input for now and add the untyped method later if there's demand?
I think it could also mean that it's from a checked json. what about
from_untyped_jsonorfrom_untyped?