Conversation
|
Hey! Thanks for the suggestion 😃 I do have one big concern, however: this proposal makes it impossible to statically know what scripts are available. We would always have to execute the Javascript code to figure it out. |
|
@arcanis Yes, I suppose that is another drawback that should be added. Is this concern due to a performance hit or something else? The Javascript code would only be executed if a filename input is provided. |
|
@arcanis Hey just following up on this. Can you tell me how likely it is that this PR will be accepted anytime soon? The reason I am asking, is that we are currently evaluating some options for cleaning up our scripts. See mui/material-ui#15497 If this is not going to be accepted, then I would like to resolve any issues so it can be accepted, or look at other options, such as using nps. |
|
This is one of the reasons I added support of You can write scripts like this: scripts:
# This is some comment
test: >-
pnpm recursive test
--reporter append-only
--workspace-concurrency 1
--filter ./packages
--filter ./privatePackages
build: pnpm recursive run tsc |
Allow scripts to be imported from a file as an alternative to the standard object hash in the packages.json scripts field. Also define the basic structure of the imported file.
RFC
Documentation: yarnpkg/website#951
PR: yarnpkg/yarn#7284