Add polygonize benchmark comparing xrspatial vs rasterio#1007
Merged
brendancol merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Mar 14, 2026
Merged
Add polygonize benchmark comparing xrspatial vs rasterio#1007brendancol merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
brendancol merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Standalone benchmark script that compares xrspatial polygonize (numpy and cupy backends) against rasterio.features.shapes across 5 raster patterns (few large regions, many small regions, checkerboard, concentric rings, masked blobs) at 4 resolutions. Outputs timing tables, consistency checks (polygon count and area agreement), and a markdown report.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1006
Summary
benchmarks/benchmark_polygonize.py, a standalone comparison of xrspatial polygonize againstrasterio.features.shapes(GDAL)benchmarks/POLYGONIZE_BENCHMARKS.mdwith timing tables, ratios, and consistency resultsrasterizer_benchmarks.pyInitial results: xrspatial-numpy is faster than rasterio in all 20 configurations. Consistency is 100% (identical polygon counts and areas).
Test plan
python benchmarks/benchmark_polygonize.pyend to end