-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Revise py-script examples and copy to oemof-examples #97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
836f8a8 to
ca2f427
Compare
|
This pull request introduces 3 alerts and fixes 2 when merging c058db5 into 4b7a082 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
fixed alerts:
|
|
This pull request fixes 2 alerts when merging d5614d5 into 4b7a082 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
|
Thanks for this PR @uvchik. I like that the weather data is automatically downloaded now! If I understood it correctly though, the dummy csv files containing power and power coefficient curves still need to be downloaded manually, right? I think it's fine for now as it is my task to get rid of them altogether (see #73). But I would wait with moving the examples to the oemof examples repository until I did this. Besides that I don't have any other comments. |
|
I removed the dummy turbine in the example at oemof-examples, so in that example only the weather data is needed. I could the remove the dummy turbine in the internal example as well but I was not sure whether or not people might be interested in this use case. |
|
Mmh, I'm undecided... It might be useful to show people how they can provide their own turbine library file. So I guess I'm leaning more towards leaving the dummy turbine file. |
|
Oh the other hand, the oedb file already shows the structure such a file must have. "You can load your own power (coefficient) curve data from a file structured like link_to_oedb_files". I'd be fine with both removing and keeping the files. |
|
I tend to remove the dummy turbine. If people convert their data to the windpowerlib format they should send it to us, so that we can add it to the oedb and the windpowerlib. In that case the data will be available for everyone. If people have their data in a different format they can use the way we show with the |
|
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging a8b43f4 into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
|
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging 31ef550 into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
…ind-python/windpowerlib into features/revise-python-script-examples
|
I added another variant to create a So, I would remove the dummy data and improve the examples on how to use your own data. Have a look at the new example script to see what I mean. I could remove all csv files but the notebooks would not work anymore. |
|
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging 025dc89 into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
|
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging 8147e5c into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
|
I added information about how to integrate your own data to getting started/README. I think this is enough and easier to handle constructing a special csv-file as suggested in the dummy_turbine example. Therefore, I vote for removing it from the examples. |
|
Any comments? If you like the idea we could remove the "dummy_turbine" from the notebooks as well and remove the csv-files. There are some typos in the README. We should fix them in case we do agree in the basic idea. |
|
I'm not sure if I understand it right, but from the data management perspective, I would recommend to keep the data template files. |
|
In my opinion these files are not meant as templates but as example files. Otherwise I would not hide them in I do not see the sense of template files there, except in the context of "How to send your own turbine data to the oedb". But this should be placed elsewhere not in the examples. |
|
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging 103880f into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
…es/revise-python-script-examples
…ind-python/windpowerlib into features/revise-python-script-examples
|
This pull request introduces 1 alert and fixes 2 when merging 3628279 into 89ca403 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
fixed alerts:
|
|
Okay, it seems that there are no objections. @birgits Will you integrate the changes in the Notebooks? |
Fixes #88