[selectors-5][editorial] Add formal definition and production rule of :local-link()#13585
Open
[selectors-5][editorial] Add formal definition and production rule of :local-link()#13585
Conversation
fantasai
requested changes
Apr 14, 2026
Collaborator
fantasai
left a comment
fantasai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I would keep the sentence as it was previously (because that flows nicely and quickly gives the conceptual definition up front), and then just use <<integer>> in the definition.
Collaborator
Author
|
I have no problem restoring the initial sentence flow but note that Do you intentionally want to accept |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR wraps the first occurrence of
:local-link()in<dfn>and adds a production rule, following:heading/:heading()as an example.:local-linkhas an associated<dfn>but:local-link()does not. So@webref/cssincludes the first, not the second.I am aware that there are discussions about renaming them, but this "in-between" state is confusing.