Improve intersect_by_rank performance

[robert3005]

We never spent time and this is useful for merging selections and filters in
scans

Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski github@robertk.io

[robert3005]

I will go over this tomorrow @joseph-isaacs I looked at #7098 and #7393 which both optimised slightly different cases of this function. I tried to combine the two.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 23.82%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 24 improved benchmarks
❌ 24 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1158 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]	131.4 µs	168 µs	-21.8%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]	247.1 µs	320.1 µs	-22.82%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-23.69%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]	2.3 ms	3.1 ms	-23.82%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]	142.5 µs	179.1 µs	-20.45%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]	267.9 µs	341 µs	-21.42%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]	1.3 ms	1.6 ms	-22.23%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]	2.5 ms	3.3 ms	-22.35%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]	212.4 µs	249.1 µs	-14.72%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]	386.2 µs	459.3 µs	-15.91%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]	1.8 ms	2.2 ms	-16.95%
❌	Simulation	take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]	3.5 ms	4.3 ms	-17.1%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]	162.1 µs	193.3 µs	-16.14%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]	307 µs	369.1 µs	-16.83%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]	1.5 ms	1.8 ms	-17.4%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)]	2.9 ms	3.5 ms	-17.49%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]	174.6 µs	205.8 µs	-15.15%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.1)]	331.8 µs	393.9 µs	-15.77%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)]	1.6 ms	1.9 ms	-16.31%
❌	Simulation	take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)]	3.2 ms	3.8 ms	-16.39%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

---

_{Comparing rk/intersect-by-rank (ea3104a) with develop (8e0b58c)}