chore: apply Clippy suggestions and improve code formatting

[nyurik]

• clippy::doc_link_with_quotes
• clippy::flat_map_option
• clippy::format_push_string
• clippy::from_iter_instead_of_collect
• clippy::large_types_passed_by_value
• clippy::struct_field_names
• clippy::unnested_or_patterns

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/follow-name (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 284 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 38 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing nyurik:clippy (4c43544) with main (dec633c)}

Footnotes

1. 38 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/follow-name (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[xtqqczze]

@nyurik I've been fixing some clippy lints, I usually stick to 1 lint per PR for ease of review

[nyurik]

@xtqqczze thx, makes sense. I moved a big number formatting change into #10717 making this PR only 50 line changes - hopefully makes it much easier to review

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/tee (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/basenc/bounded-memory is now passing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[sylvestre]

sorry but it conflicts

[nyurik]

sec, will fix in a min

[nyurik]

@sylvestre good to go?

[nyurik]

oops, missed it, thx, fixed

[sylvestre]

i wish you were splitting it per class of linters
it is a bit messy now :/

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/dd/no-allocate is now being skipped but was previously passing.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/pr/bounded-memory is no longer failing!

[xtqqczze]

i wish you were splitting it per class of linters it is a bit messy now :/

I've split struct_field_names into #10902 to make this a bit less messy :)

[nyurik]

Thanks @xtqqczze , i removed it from this PR

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/pr/bounded-memory. tests/pr/bounded-memory is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Congrats! The gnu test tests/factor/t28 is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/factor/t29 is no longer failing!
Note: The gnu test tests/unexpand/bounded-memory is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/factor/t34 is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!