Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Closing until the multi-character symbols situation is resolved. |
Collaborator
|
Reopening since the multi-character symbols situation has been resolved a while ago. |
T0mstone
requested changes
Oct 14, 2025
Collaborator
T0mstone
left a comment
T0mstone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changelog needs to be updated now too (cf. #121 (review)).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The permanent paper sign is not technically a recycling symbol, but it's closely related and I'd not sure where else it'd go.
Two of the symbols need text variation selectors.
I went with "recycle" instead of "recycling" since it's shorter, but I can be convinced either way.