Skip to content

Conversation

@Imambash6
Copy link

No description provided.

@tobySolutions
Copy link
Owner

Code Review

Style (9/10)

  • The code is well-structured and easy to read.
  • Consistent use of whitespace and formatting.
  • However, there are some minor issues:
    • Missing spaces around equals signs in the with: section.
    • Consider adding a blank line between jobs and steps for better readability.

Security (10/10)

  • The workflow uses an official GitHub Action (actions/checkout@v4) and a trusted security tool (aquasecurity/trivy-action@master).
  • Proper authentication is not explicitly shown in the code snippet, but it's assumed to be handled by the Actions environment.

Performance (8/10)

  • The schedule section runs the workflow every Monday at midnight UTC. This might lead to unnecessary runs if no changes are pushed on Sundays.
  • Consider adding a needs: [ dependencies ] directive to ensure that the scan is only triggered after dependencies have been fetched.

Design (8/10)

  • The workflow name, "Dependency Scan", clearly describes its purpose.
  • However, it's unclear what exactly this workflow scans (code dependencies or environment dependencies).
  • Consider adding a description field to provide more context about the workflow.

To address these points, I would suggest:

...
-        - name: Checkout Code
+      - name: Checkout code repository

      # Run Trivy for scanning code dependencies
      - name: Run Trivy Dependency Scan
        uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master
        with:
          scan-type: 'fs'
          ignore-unfixed: true  # ignore vulnerabilities without fixes 
          format: 'table'
          exit-code: '0'  # change to '1' if you want workflow to fail if vulnerabilities are found

      ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants