Skip to content

Conversation

@Eijebong
Copy link
Contributor

Yay python, it's great... In 20b45ba we made sure that we'd return read only dicts from this function since it's caching the result, but we kinda forgot that the value was a set and thus was still mutable... This commits freezes said sets so now those objects should be properly read only...

@Eijebong Eijebong requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2025 14:27
@Eijebong Eijebong requested a review from bhearsum October 17, 2025 14:27
…t mutable inside

Yay python, it's great... In 20b45ba we
made sure that we'd return read only dicts from this function since it's
caching the result, but we kinda forgot that the value was a set and
thus was still mutable... This commits freezes said sets so now those
objects should be properly read only...
@Eijebong Eijebong force-pushed the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa branch from 4d1f2d3 to 3f077bb Compare October 17, 2025 14:29
@Eijebong Eijebong enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2025 14:33
@Eijebong Eijebong merged commit 03f2acd into taskcluster:main Oct 17, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants