superdoc-dev · andrii-harbour · May 30, 2026
@@ -61,13 +61,88 @@ describe('validateValueAgainstTypeSpec – oneOf with mixed schemas', () => {
     oneOf: [{ const: 'block' }, { type: 'object', properties: { kind: { const: 'inline' } }, required: ['kind'] }],
   };
 
-  test('falls back to generic message when variants are not all const', () => {
+  test('enumerates the accepted variant shapes when nothing matches', () => {
     try {
       validateValueAgainstTypeSpec('nope', mixedSchema, 'target');
       throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
     } catch (error) {
       const cliError = error as CliError;
-      expect(cliError.message).toBe('target must match one of the allowed schema variants.');
+      expect(cliError.message).toBe(
+        'target must match one of: "block" | { kind: "inline" }. Received a string ("nope").',
+      );
+    }
+  });
+});
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Tagged-union (target/at) actionable errors — the dominant LLM failure class.
+// These exercise the REAL contract schemas so the assertions track what an
+// agent actually sees. See customer error pivot: "insert:target …" and
+// "create paragraph:at must match one of the allowed schema variants."
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+describe('validateValueAgainstTypeSpec – tagged-union actionable errors (real schemas)', () => {
+  const atSchema = CLI_OPERATION_METADATA['doc.create.paragraph'].params.find((p) => p.name === 'at')?.schema;
+  const insertTargetSchema = CLI_OPERATION_METADATA['doc.insert'].params.find((p) => p.name === 'target')?.schema;
+
+  if (!atSchema || !insertTargetSchema) {
+    throw new Error('metadata missing create.paragraph:at or insert:target schema');
+  }
+
+  test('flattened "at" (nodeId hoisted out of target) names the missing field', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec({ kind: 'after', nodeId: 'ABC123' }, atSchema, 'at');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      // Was the misleading "at.nodeId is not allowed by schema."
+      expect((error as CliError).message).toBe('at.target is required.');
+    }
+  });
+
+  test('unknown "at" kind enumerates the valid kinds and echoes what was sent', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec({ kind: 'sidebar' }, atSchema, 'at');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      // Was the misleading "at.target is required."
+      expect((error as CliError).message).toBe(
+        'at.kind must be one of: "documentStart", "documentEnd", "before", "after" (received "sidebar").',
+      );
+    }
+  });
+
+  test('bare string "at" enumerates the accepted shapes instead of the opaque union error', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec('ABC123', atSchema, 'at');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      const message = (error as CliError).message;
+      expect(message).not.toContain('allowed schema variants');
+      expect(message).toContain('at must match one of:');
+      expect(message).toContain('kind: "before"');
+      expect(message).toContain('Received a string ("ABC123")');
+    }
+  });
+
+  test('insert target missing nodeType names the missing field', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec({ kind: 'block', nodeId: 'ABC123' }, insertTargetSchema, 'target');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      const message = (error as CliError).message;
+      expect(message).not.toContain('allowed schema variants');
+      expect(message).toContain('nodeType');
+    }
+  });
+
+  test('bare string insert target enumerates the accepted shapes', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec('ABC123', insertTargetSchema, 'target');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      const message = (error as CliError).message;
+      expect(message).not.toContain('allowed schema variants');
+      expect(message).toContain('target must match one of:');
     }
   });
 });
@@ -108,6 +183,44 @@ describe('validateValueAgainstTypeSpec – repeated actionable oneOf errors', ()
   });
 });
 
+// Without a shared const discriminator across object variants, the
+// discriminator path cannot intercept — a repeated error must therefore surface
+// through `selectRepeatedActionableOneOfError`. Pins that fallback so a future
+// change to the discriminator gate can't silently make it unreachable.
+describe('validateValueAgainstTypeSpec – repeated actionable oneOf errors (no discriminator)', () => {
+  const repeatedRequiredSchema: CliTypeSpec = {
+    oneOf: [
+      {
+        type: 'object',
+        properties: {
+          id: { type: 'string' },
+          name: { type: 'string' },
+        },
+        required: ['id'],
+      },
+      {
+        type: 'object',
+        properties: {
+          id: { type: 'string' },
+          label: { type: 'string' },
+        },
+        required: ['id'],
+      },
+    ],
+  };
+
+  test('surfaces the repeated required-field error when no discriminator exists', () => {
+    try {
+      validateValueAgainstTypeSpec({ name: 'x' }, repeatedRequiredSchema, 'target');
+      throw new Error('Expected CliError to be thrown');
+    } catch (error) {
+      const cliError = error as CliError;
+      expect(cliError.message).toBe('target.id is required.');
+      expect((cliError.details as { selectedError?: string }).selectedError).toBe('target.id is required.');
+    }
+  });
+});
+
 describe('validateValueAgainstTypeSpec – enum branch', () => {
   const enumSchema: CliTypeSpec = {
     type: 'string',

@@ -146,6 +146,85 @@ function selectRepeatedActionableOneOfError(path: string, errors: string[]): str
   return bestMessage;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Render a variant's shape compactly so a oneOf failure can name the accepted
+ * forms (e.g. `{ kind: "before", target }`) instead of an opaque "must match
+ * one of the allowed schema variants". Object properties show their `const`
+ * discriminator when present, and a trailing `?` when optional.
+ */
+function describeVariant(variant: CliTypeSpec): string {
+  if ('const' in variant) return JSON.stringify(variant.const);
+  if ('oneOf' in variant) return (variant.oneOf as CliTypeSpec[]).map(describeVariant).join(' | ');
+  if (variant.enum) return variant.enum.map((entry) => JSON.stringify(entry)).join(' | ');
+  if (variant.type === 'object') {
+    const properties = variant.properties ?? {};
+    const required = new Set(variant.required ?? []);
+    const keys = Object.keys(properties);
+    if (keys.length === 0) return 'object';
+    const parts = keys.map((key) => {
+      const prop = properties[key];
+      if (prop && 'const' in prop) return `${key}: ${JSON.stringify(prop.const)}`;
+      return required.has(key) ? key : `${key}?`;
+    });
+    return `{ ${parts.join(', ')} }`;
+  }
+  if (variant.type === 'array') return 'array';
+  if (variant.type === 'json') return 'object';
+  return variant.type ?? 'value';
+}
+
+/**
+ * The property key that carries a `const` in every object variant — the
+ * discriminator of a tagged union (e.g. `kind` for target/at, `op` for
+ * mutation steps). Returns null when there is no such shared key. Non-object
+ * variants (e.g. a bare string ref) are ignored so mixed unions still resolve.
+ */
+function getOneOfDiscriminator(variants: readonly CliTypeSpec[]): string | null {
+  const objectVariants = variants.filter(
+    (variant): variant is Extract<CliTypeSpec, { type: 'object' }> =>
+      !('const' in variant) && !('oneOf' in variant) && variant.type === 'object' && isRecord(variant.properties),
+  );
+  if (objectVariants.length < 2) return null;
+  for (const key of Object.keys(objectVariants[0].properties)) {
+    const sharedByAll = objectVariants.every((variant) => {
+      const prop = variant.properties[key];
+      return prop != null && 'const' in prop;
+    });
+    if (sharedByAll) return key;
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+
+/** The const value a variant pins for `key`, if any (its discriminator tag). */
+function variantConstFor(variant: CliTypeSpec, key: string): unknown {
+  if ('const' in variant || 'oneOf' in variant || variant.type !== 'object') return undefined;
+  const prop = variant.properties?.[key];
+  return prop && 'const' in prop ? prop.const : undefined;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Truncate a serialized value to keep oneOf error messages bounded — a caller
+ * accidentally passing a multi-MB string as `target`/`at` shouldn't inflate
+ * logs or the LLM context window. Matches the truncation pattern used by the
+ * REPAIR_BLOCKED preview.
+ */
+function truncateForError(serialized: string, max = 64): string {
+  return serialized.length > max ? `${serialized.slice(0, max)}…` : serialized;
+}
+
+/** Human description of a received value, for oneOf error messages. */
+function describeReceived(value: unknown): string {
+  if (value === null) return 'null';
+  if (Array.isArray(value)) return 'an array';
+  const valueType = typeof value;
+  if (valueType === 'object') {
+    const keys = Object.keys(value as Record<string, unknown>);
+    return keys.length > 0 ? `an object with keys [${keys.join(', ')}]` : 'an empty object';
+  }
+  if (valueType === 'string') return `a string (${truncateForError(JSON.stringify(value))})`;
+  return `a ${valueType} (${truncateForError(JSON.stringify(value))})`;
+}
+
 export function validateValueAgainstTypeSpec(value: unknown, schema: CliTypeSpec, path: string): void {
   if ('const' in schema) {
     if (value !== schema.const) {
@@ -166,12 +245,44 @@ export function validateValueAgainstTypeSpec(value: unknown, schema: CliTypeSpec
       }
     }
 
+    // Tagged-union path (target/at keyed by `kind`, mutation steps keyed by
+    // `op`): when the value carries the discriminator, surface the matching
+    // variant's specific failure ("at.target is required.") or the set of
+    // valid tags. This lets an LLM self-correct instead of retrying the same
+    // malformed shape against an opaque union error.
+    const discriminator = getOneOfDiscriminator(variants);
+    if (discriminator && isRecord(value) && value[discriminator] !== undefined) {
+      const received = value[discriminator];
+      const matched = variants.find((variant) => variantConstFor(variant, discriminator) === received);
+      if (matched) {
+        try {
+          validateValueAgainstTypeSpec(value, matched, path);
+          // Unreachable in practice: `matched` already failed in the outer
+          // variant loop above (deterministic same-input revalidation must
+          // throw again). Explicit return so a future fast-path refactor on
+          // this function can't silently let control fall through to the
+          // unmatched-tag throw below with a falsely-matched value.
+          return;
+        } catch (error) {
+          const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
+          throw new CliError('VALIDATION_ERROR', message, { errors, selectedError: message });
+        }
+      }
+      const allowedTags = variants
+        .map((variant) => variantConstFor(variant, discriminator))
+        .filter((tag) => tag !== undefined)
+        .map((tag) => JSON.stringify(tag));
+      const unmatchedTagMessage = `${path}.${discriminator} must be one of: ${allowedTags.join(', ')} (received ${truncateForError(JSON.stringify(received))}).`;
+      throw new CliError('VALIDATION_ERROR', unmatchedTagMessage, { errors, selectedError: unmatchedTagMessage });
+    }
+
     const allowedValues = extractConstValues(variants);
     const selectedError = selectRepeatedActionableOneOfError(path, errors);
     const message =
       allowedValues.length > 0
         ? `${path} must be one of: ${allowedValues.join(', ')}.`
-        : (selectedError ?? `${path} must match one of the allowed schema variants.`);
+        : (selectedError ??
+          `${path} must match one of: ${variants.map(describeVariant).join(' | ')}. Received ${describeReceived(value)}.`);
     throw new CliError('VALIDATION_ERROR', message, { errors, selectedError });
   }
 

@@ -998,6 +998,13 @@ export function executeTextRewrite(
         tr.replaceWith(remap(change.docFrom), remap(change.docTo), content);
       }
     }
+  } else if (trimmedNew.length === 0) {
+    // Pure deletion after trimming: a non-empty replacement whose new text is
+    // fully contained in the old text's common prefix + suffix collapses to an
+    // empty delta (e.g. "best endeavours to:" → "endeavours to:" leaves
+    // trimmedNew === ""). Delete the removed range rather than building
+    // schema.text('') — ProseMirror rejects empty text nodes.
+    tr.delete(trimmedFrom, trimmedTo);
   } else {
     // 0 or 1 word change: replace just the trimmed range.
     const content = buildTextWithTabs(editor.state.schema, trimmedNew, asProseMirrorMarks(marks));

@@ -227,7 +227,11 @@ describe('remap correctness: mapping.map called with compiled positions', () =>
 
     expect(tr.mapping.map).toHaveBeenCalledWith(3);
     expect(tr.mapping.map).toHaveBeenCalledWith(10);
-    expect(tr.replaceWith).toHaveBeenCalledWith(5, 12, expect.anything());
+    // An empty replacement collapses to a pure deletion: it must use tr.delete,
+    // not tr.replaceWith with an empty text node (ProseMirror rejects empty
+    // text nodes — the mocked schema previously hid that crash).
+    expect(tr.delete).toHaveBeenCalledWith(5, 12);
+    expect(tr.replaceWith).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
 
   it('equal length replacement: maps positions through mapping', () => {

@@ -343,6 +343,54 @@ describe('doc.replace multi-paragraph integration', () => {
     expect(accepted).not.toContain('Smith  address');
   });
 
+  // Customer-reported crash ("Empty text nodes are not allowed"): a non-empty
+  // replacement whose new text is fully contained in the old text's prefix +
+  // suffix trims to an EMPTY delta. The single-change branch must delete the
+  // removed text rather than build schema.text('') (which ProseMirror rejects).
+  it('rewrites a replacement that trims to an empty delta as a deletion (executor)', () => {
+    editor = makeEditor(['the Company refers to: the following terms']);
+    const { step, target } = compileSingleRewrite(editor, 'refers to:', 'to:');
+    const tr = editor.state.tr;
+
+    const outcome = executeTextRewrite(editor, tr, target as any, step as any, tr.mapping as any);
+
+    expect(outcome).toEqual({ changed: true });
+    expect(tr.doc.textContent).toBe('the Company to: the following terms');
+  });
+
+  it('handles a tracked replace that trims to an empty delta (deletion only)', () => {
+    editor = makeEditor(['We will use our best endeavours to: deliver']);
+    const receipt = editor.doc.replace(
+      {
+        ref: getFirstMatchRef(editor, 'best endeavours to:'),
+        text: 'endeavours to:',
+      },
+      { changeMode: 'tracked' },
+    );
+
+    expect(receipt.success).toBe(true);
+
+    // Accepted view: drop trackDelete marks, keep everything else.
+    const acceptedParts: string[] = [];
+    editor.state.doc.descendants((node: any) => {
+      if (!node.isText || !node.text) return;
+      const isDeleted = node.marks.some((mark: any) => mark.type.name === TrackDeleteMarkName);
+      if (!isDeleted) acceptedParts.push(node.text);
+    });
+
+    expect(acceptedParts.join('')).toBe('We will use our endeavours to: deliver');
+
+    // The trimmed-away prefix "best " must be represented as a tracked deletion.
+    const deletedTexts: string[] = [];
+    editor.state.doc.descendants((node: any) => {
+      if (!node.isText || !node.text) return;
+      if (node.marks.some((mark: any) => mark.type.name === TrackDeleteMarkName)) {
+        deletedTexts.push(node.text);
+      }
+    });
+    expect(deletedTexts.join('')).toContain('best');
+  });
+
   it('SD-3044: tracked rewrite of long block preserves spacing across multiple equal anchors', () => {
     editor = makeEditor([
       '[insert] Pty Limited a company incorporated in Australia having its registered office at [insert] (ACN [insert])("Company")',