Clarify need for method attribute in JSP authorize tag#18566
Open
Hann244 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
Open
Clarify need for method attribute in JSP authorize tag#18566Hann244 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
Hann244 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
Conversation
Closes spring-projectsgh-16530 This aligns the JSP documentation with the changes made in spring-projectsgh-16529. Added a NOTE to clarify that the method attribute is required when the underlying RequestMatcher is method-specific. Signed-off-by: onhann <gusgus1467@naver.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes gh-16530
Adds a NOTE to the JSP taglibs documentation clarifying that when authorization is configured with a method-specific RequestMatcher, sec:authorize should specify the corresponding method so it is evaluated against the intended rule.
This follows the background discussion in gh-16529.