Skip to content

Decouple performance info from README#21

Open
strzibny wants to merge 1 commit intoserpapi:masterfrom
strzibny:benchmarks
Open

Decouple performance info from README#21
strzibny wants to merge 1 commit intoserpapi:masterfrom
strzibny:benchmarks

Conversation

@strzibny
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest not mixing up performance details directly into README especially since we now use as source for our integrations pages. We are talking about performance optimization even before letting people install the gem which might be confusing or suggest the gem is somehow slow. For now, I only decoupled the info into BENCHMARKS.md (feel free to suggest a different name for the file), I'll likely submit more changes regarding the text itself. Btw it's great we have benchmarks and care about performance, but we should invite people to try the gem first and foremost. We can point them to this level of optimization later.

@strzibny strzibny requested a review from trusche March 16, 2026 13:48
@trusche
Copy link
Contributor

trusche commented Mar 16, 2026

I'm all for it, and don't see similar sections in our other clients at a casual glance, but would like a 2nd opinion. @aciddjus or @hartator, WDYT?

@strzibny
Copy link
Contributor Author

One important thing to say is that cleaning this up (together with development guide which we already did) will make more space to focus on features/supported APIs. The README will look better if it's just intro, installation, features/API examples.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants