Bump senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml from 3 to 4#216
Conversation
….yaml Bumps [senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources) from 3 to 4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...v4) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml dependency-version: '4' dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ Identify Defects
✅ Project memory configuration
Testing
Documentation❌ CHANGELOG.md not updated
✅ Inline comments
✅ Markdown formatting
Security✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation
✅ Proper error handling
✅ No sensitive data in logs
✅ No license files or sensitive strings
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ Mostly Approved with Minor Documentation Gap This is a straightforward dependency update with no code quality or security concerns. The primary issue is the missing CHANGELOG entry. Required Actions:
Recommended Actions:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewSenzing Code ReviewAnalyzing the pull request diff against the review checklist... Review ResultsCode Quality ✅
Testing
|
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisOverviewThis PR updates the GitHub Actions workflow reference from Checklist ResultsCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ Identify Defects
✅ Project memory configuration
Testing
Documentation✅ Readme updated if needed
✅ API docs updated
✅ Inline comments for complex logic
✅ Markdown formatting
Security✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation implemented
✅ Proper error handling
✅ No sensitive data in logs
✅ No license files or sensitive strings
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations This is a low-risk change that bumps a reusable workflow dependency. The primary recommendation is to verify compatibility with v4 of the referenced workflow to ensure no breaking changes affect the lint behavior. Action Items:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll review this pull request against the Senzing code review checklist. Code ReviewOverviewThis PR updates the GitHub Actions workflow to use version 4 of the Review Checklist ResultsCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide - This is a GitHub Actions workflow file. The YAML syntax and structure are correct and follow GitHub Actions conventions. ✅ No commented-out code - The change is clean with no commented code. ✅ Meaningful variable names - N/A for this change (no new variables introduced). ✅ DRY principle followed - N/A for this change. ✅ Identify Defects - No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected. This is a straightforward version bump of a reusable workflow reference. ✅ Project memory configuration - No Testing
✅ Edge cases covered - N/A for this type of change. ✅ Test coverage > 80% - N/A for workflow files. Documentation❌ CHANGELOG.md updated - ✅ Inline comments for complex logic - N/A for this simple version change. ✅ API docs updated - N/A for workflow changes. ✅ Markdown formatting - N/A (no markdown files changed in this PR). Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - No credentials present. ✅ Input validation implemented - N/A for this change. ✅ Proper error handling - Inherited from the reusable workflow. ✅ No sensitive data in logs - No logging changes in this PR. ✅ No license files checked in - No SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ Approved with minor recommendations This is a low-risk infrastructure change that updates a reusable workflow version. The main recommendation is to:
Questions to Consider:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisSummaryThis PR updates the workflow version from Code Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ No defects identified
✅ Project memory compliance
Testing
|
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisPull Request SummaryThis PR updates the GitHub Actions workflow reference from Review Checklist ResultsCode Quality
Testing
Documentation
Security
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor suggestion This is a low-risk change that updates a reusable workflow dependency. The only recommendation is to update the CHANGELOG.md to document this infrastructure change. Action Items:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisAnalyzing the pull request diff against the Senzing code review checklist: SummaryThis PR updates the version reference for the lint-workflows.yaml from v3 to v4 in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration. Code Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ Identify Defects
✅ Project memory configuration
Testing
Note: Since this updates a reusable workflow reference, the change will be validated when the workflow runs. Consider verifying that the v4 version of Documentation
Recommendation: If your project maintains a CHANGELOG, consider adding an entry like "Updated lint-workflows reusable workflow from v3 to v4" under a "Changed" or "Infrastructure" section. Security✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation
✅ Proper error handling
✅ No sensitive data in logs
✅ No license files or
Overall AssessmentStatus: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations This is a clean, low-risk change that updates a workflow dependency. The only suggestion is to consider adding a CHANGELOG entry if your project tracks infrastructure updates. Files Changed: Risk Level: Low - This is a standard dependency update for a GitHub Actions reusable workflow.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll review this pull request against the checklist immediately. Code Review AnalysisPull Request SummaryThis PR updates the GitHub workflow dependency from Review Checklist ResultsCode Quality
Testing
Note: Testing checklist items are not applicable for workflow version updates. However, it would be good practice to verify the workflow runs successfully with Documentation
Security
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations Critical Issues: 0Recommendations:
Positive Notes:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml-4
🤖 Claude Code ReviewThis PR appears to contain only metadata changes (labels, description, etc.). |
Bumps senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml from 3 to 4.
Release notes
Sourced from senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/lint-workflows.yaml's changelog.
Commits
52eb86bbump tags to v4, slack channel override, missing claude settings (#262)08fb769#260 make shared workflows generic, misc cleanup (#261)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)Resolves #260
Resolves #262
Resolves #261
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#261
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#257
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#259
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#254
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#250
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#255
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#249
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#256
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#252
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#253
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#244
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#246
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#248