Closed
Conversation
…chat moderation might work
…ial code for muting indivudual / everyone via the capability
…allum/voice-moderation-2
…allum/voice-moderation-2
…add stub code for info request
… a parcel with restricted voice
# Conflicts: # indra/newview/llviewerstats.h
…o the same voice space
NOTES
Anti-virus false positive report:
|
kylelinden
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2025
kylelinden
left a comment
kylelinden
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Voice Moderation Alpha approved.
viewer = 2026.1.0.20108649989
build = https://github.com/secondlife/viewer/releases/tag/Second_Life_Project_Voice_Moderation%23c5c9b1f-2025-12-11
cohort = Voice Moderation
desired = 0
Collaborator
Author
|
This pull request is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or it will be closed in 7 days |
First test returns quarter to a half the throughput, do two tests. May be caused by driver, may be some 'energy saving', but not important enough to spend time investingating. It was working the same way prior to ExtraFPS, but viewer was running an extra CPU test that 'preheated' the system. Also increasing minimum throughput as numerous new features, like mirrors and pbr were added and requirements are now higher.
Implemented result caching. hasParcelLandmark can get repeatedly called when performing operations on landmarks en masse, which was causing repeated inventory searches and leads to stalls with large collections of landmarks.
by stopping after first item was found.
And increase allowed time to be more in tune with disconnects.
#5322) * Fix failure to reconnect after disconnect and occasional dropout issue We were occasionally seeing dropouts which may have been caused by ICE renegotiate requests. The code is there to reconnect in that case, but there were a few bugs, some of which were likely due to the webrtc upgrade. Also, we were seeing failures to reconnect after voice server restart. There were some issues with the PTT button that came up after the above issue was fixed. * Added a clarification as part of CR * We need to set mute state for p2p/adhoc/group calls as well
After benchmark fixes, render level jumped from lowest to high+, cap it at med+ until shadows get fixed to have less impact
Contributor
NOTES Anti-virus false positive report:
|
Collaborator
Author
|
Closing in favor of shipping in 26.2. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
11 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as of = 2025-12-12 for PV deploy
build = https://github.com/secondlife/viewer/releases/tag/Second_Life_Project_Voice_Moderation%23c5c9b1f-2025-12-11
cohort = Voice Moderation
deployed = https://github.com/secondlife/viewer/releases/tag/Second_Life_Project_Voice_Moderation%23c5c9b1f-2025-12-11
desired = 0
relnotes:
Second Life Voice Moderation Alpha
Have you heard? We're adding Voice moderation along with hosting our own WebRTC voice solution! Land owners will soon be able to moderate voice users on their own land. This Alpha viewer will have very limited availability, but we'd love for the community to try it out and give us feedback early.
How can you help?
The Second Life Project Voice Moderation viewer introduces the ability to moderate spatial voice chat in regions configured to use webRTC voice.
Who can moderate:
How to moderate:
Where to test moderation:
Moderation can currently be tested on any webRTC-enabled region, which currently means any region on the 'Second Life Preflight' channel.
For those who don't have a webRTC-enabled region that they have powers over, some public test parcels have been set up at https://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/WebRTC%20Voice%201/114/225/23
The two parcels are owned by a publicly joinable group, which has been configured to allow for any member to moderate voice chat. Both parcels are configured to use their own parcel voice channel. Click the green orb for instructions.
The main parcel in 'WebRTC Voice 1' uses the region channel, and can only be moderated by the region owner or an estate manager.
Help Us Keep Improving!
Help us shape the future of Second Life! Found a bug or have feedback? Please submit it via our [Feedback Portal](https://feedback.secondlife.com/).
Thanks for being a vital part of the Second Life journey. We can’t wait to see what you create with these latest enhancements!