Skip to content

Conversation

@LucaMarconato
Copy link
Member

~20x faster performance when reading points data in Xenium (tested with around ~100 million transcripts). See scverse/spatialdata#1061

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.77778% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.98%. Comparing base (785fa9a) to head (3b756da).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/spatialdata_io/readers/xenium.py 77.77% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #363      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.94%   62.98%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        3139     3147       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         1976     1982       +6     
- Misses       1163     1165       +2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata_io/readers/xenium.py 72.43% <77.77%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@LucaMarconato LucaMarconato merged commit 1431911 into main Feb 3, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@LucaMarconato LucaMarconato deleted the performance/xenium-points-parsing branch February 3, 2026 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants