[Graphite MQ] Draft PR GROUP:spec_65f6d2 (PRs 4120, 4121, 4119, 4126)#4129
[Graphite MQ] Draft PR GROUP:spec_65f6d2 (PRs 4120, 4121, 4119, 4126)#4129graphite-app[bot] wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
# Description Added browser-specific exports for the `@rivetkit/traces` package to ensure proper bundling in browser environments. This change: 1. Created a browser-specific entry point (`index.browser.ts`) that provides a stub implementation of `createTraces()` which throws an appropriate error when called in browser contexts 2. Updated the package.json to include browser-specific export conditions for all entry points 3. Reorganized imports in frontend components to use the correct paths and avoid importing server-only code in the browser 4. Consolidated type imports to come from their appropriate modules ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Verified that the frontend components can properly import the trace-related types and functions without pulling in server-only code. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
# Description Updated all imports of `zod` to use the more specific `zod/v4` path across the RivetKit TypeScript codebase. This change ensures consistent versioning of the Zod library throughout the project. Also downgraded the CodeMirror commands package from version 6.9.0 to 6.8.1 and TypeScript from 5.9.3 to 5.9.2 in the dependencies. ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? The existing test suite has been run to verify that the import path changes don't affect functionality. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
# Description Refactored the traces package to improve module organization by: 1. Creating dedicated entry points for specific functionality: - Added `encoding.ts` for ReadRangeWire encoding/decoding functions - Added `otlp-entry.ts` for OTLP-related functionality 2. Updated imports across the codebase to use these new entry points: - Changed imports from `@rivetkit/traces/reader` to `@rivetkit/traces/encoding` - Added path mappings in tsconfig.json for the new entry points - Updated package.json exports to expose the new entry points 3. Updated the build script to include the new entry points in the build process ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Verified that all imports resolve correctly and the application builds successfully. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
# Description Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
|
This PR was not deployed automatically as @graphite-app[bot] does not have access to the Railway project. In order to get automatic PR deploys, please add @graphite-app[bot] to your workspace on Railway. |
Pull Request ReviewThis PR combines 4 separate PRs (#4120, #4121, #4119, #4126) addressing various improvements across the codebase. Here's my feedback: ✅ Overall AssessmentThe changes are well-structured and address specific issues. The code follows the repository's conventions and patterns. However, there are a few areas that need attention. 🔍 Detailed Feedback by Component1. Frontend: Archive/Delete Functionality (#4126)Good:
Issues:
Suggestions:
2. RivetKit: Traces Package Refactoring (#4119, #4120)Good:
Issues:
Suggestions:
3. RivetKit: Zod v4 Migration (#4121)Good:
Issues:
Critical:
4. Frontend: Type Updates & RefactoringGood:
Minor:
5. Examples & DocumentationGood:
Issues:
🔒 Security Considerations
⚡ Performance Considerations
🧪 TestingMissing:
📝 Action ItemsMust Fix:
Should Fix:
Nice to Have:
📊 Summary
Recommendation: Fix the critical issues (CSS duplication, README npm→pnpm, Zod imports) before merging. Consider adding tests in a follow-up PR if time is constrained. |
This draft PR was created by the Graphite merge queue.
Trunk will be fast forwarded to the HEAD of this PR when CI passes, and the original PRs will be closed.
The following PRs are included in this draft PR: