Skip to content

Conversation

@encukou
Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou commented Nov 10, 2025

  • Mark as accepted
  • Add implementation issue (this should be much more helpful now; I may remove/repurpose the branch at some point)
  • Remove empty Open Issues section

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • (n/a) Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4695.org.readthedocs.build/

- Mark as accepted
- Add implementation issue
- Remove empty Open Issues section
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title PEP 793: Mark as accepted PEP 793: Mark as Accepted Nov 10, 2025
@AA-Turner AA-Turner merged commit b433203 into python:main Nov 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@encukou encukou deleted the 793-accepted branch November 11, 2025 12:35
woodruffw pushed a commit to woodruffw-forks/peps that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants