Skip to content

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Oct 12, 2025

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4654.org.readthedocs.build/

@hugovk hugovk requested a review from pablogsal as a code owner October 12, 2025 15:38
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 5d71d76 into python:main Oct 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep799-accepted branch October 15, 2025 06:31
zklaus pushed a commit to zklaus/peps that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants