PEP 810: Editorial follow-ups

[AA-Turner]

• Change is either:
  • To a Draft PEP
  • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
  • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
• PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

cc @pablogsal @Yhg1s

These are some further editorial changes I'd suggest to clarify some points that currently require jumping around the text a bit.

A

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4625.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0810/

[AA-Turner]

Another editorial question: would you object to using sub-headings for the FAQ instead of bold lines? It would make things marginally easier to link to.

A

[pablogsal]

Another editorial question: would you object to using sub-headings for the FAQ instead of bold lines? It would make things marginally easier to link to.

Go ahead but I had some problems getting the markup right

[AA-Turner]

@pablogsal done, sorry for the slight delay (my computer decided to restart itself for essential updates that couldn't possibly wait!)

A

[AA-Turner]

This should really be fixed in Sphinx. Leaving these as a note to self as I'm on mobile.

A

[pablogsal]

Amazing!

[pablogsal]

Thanks a lot for the great work @AA-Turner