Skip to content

Conversation

@zooba
Copy link
Member

@zooba zooba commented Sep 19, 2025

Basic requirements (all PEP Types)

  • Read and followed PEP 1 & PEP 12
  • File created from the latest PEP template
  • PEP has next available number, & set in filename (pep-NNNN.rst), PR title (PEP 123: <Title of PEP>) and PEP header
  • Title clearly, accurately and concisely describes the content in 79 characters or less
  • Core dev/PEP editor listed as Author or Sponsor, and formally confirmed their approval
  • Author, Status (Draft), Type and Created headers filled out correctly
  • PEP-Delegate, Topic, Requires and Replaces headers completed if appropriate
  • Required sections included
    • Abstract (first section)
    • Copyright (last section; exact wording from template required)
  • Code is well-formatted (PEP 7/PEP 8) and is in code blocks, with the right lexer names if non-Python
  • PEP builds with no warnings, pre-commit checks pass and content displays as intended in the rendered HTML
  • Authors/sponsor added to .github/CODEOWNERS for the PEP

Standards Track requirements

  • PEP topic discussed in a suitable venue with general agreement that a PEP is appropriate
  • Suggested sections included (unless not applicable)
    • Motivation
    • Rationale
    • Specification
    • Backwards Compatibility
    • Security Implications
    • How to Teach This
    • Reference Implementation
    • Rejected Ideas
    • Open Issues
  • Python-Version set to valid (pre-beta) future Python version, if relevant
  • Any project stated in the PEP as supporting/endorsing/benefiting from the PEP formally confirmed such
  • Right before or after initial merging, PEP discussion thread created and linked to in Discussions-To and Post-History

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4599.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0809/

@zooba zooba marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2025 13:33
@zooba zooba requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2025 13:33
@zooba
Copy link
Member Author

zooba commented Sep 22, 2025

@python/pep-editors Anyone wanting to double-check this before I merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@willingc willingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zooba Some minor suggestions.

@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

Will review too -- sorry, haven't had time yet with PyCon UK.

@AA-Turner AA-Turner self-requested a review September 22, 2025 15:31
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay!

A

@zooba zooba merged commit fe91e2b into python:main Sep 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@zooba zooba deleted the pep809 branch September 29, 2025 19:41
zklaus pushed a commit to zklaus/peps that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants