Skip to content

Conversation

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

@brettcannon brettcannon commented Sep 5, 2025

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4577.org.readthedocs.build/

@brettcannon brettcannon requested a review from pfmoore September 5, 2025 19:31
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations!

A

@AA-Turner AA-Turner enabled auto-merge (squash) September 5, 2025 19:52
@AA-Turner AA-Turner merged commit e16e261 into python:main Sep 5, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@brettcannon brettcannon deleted the 794-acceptance branch September 5, 2025 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants