Skip to content

Conversation

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor

@jaimergp jaimergp commented Sep 3, 2025

Basic requirements (all PEP Types)

  • Read and followed PEP 1 & PEP 12
  • File created from the latest PEP template
  • PEP has next available number, & set in filename (pep-NNNN.rst), PR title (PEP 123: <Title of PEP>) and PEP header
  • Title clearly, accurately and concisely describes the content in 79 characters or less
  • Core dev/PEP editor listed as Author or Sponsor, and formally confirmed their approval
  • Author, Status (Draft), Type and Created headers filled out correctly
  • PEP-Delegate, Topic, Requires and Replaces headers completed if appropriate
  • Required sections included
    • Abstract (first section)
    • Copyright (last section; exact wording from template required)
  • Code is well-formatted (PEP 7/PEP 8) and is in code blocks, with the right lexer names if non-Python
  • PEP builds with no warnings, pre-commit checks pass and content displays as intended in the rendered HTML
  • Authors/sponsor added to .github/CODEOWNERS for the PEP

Standards Track requirements

  • PEP topic discussed in a suitable venue with general agreement that a PEP is appropriate
  • Suggested sections included (unless not applicable)
    • Motivation
    • Rationale
    • Specification
    • Backwards Compatibility
    • Security Implications
    • How to Teach This
    • Reference Implementation
    • Rejected Ideas
    • Open Issues
  • Python-Version set to valid (pre-beta) future Python version, if relevant
  • Any project stated in the PEP as supporting/endorsing/benefiting from the PEP formally confirmed such
  • Right before or after initial merging, PEP discussion thread created and linked to in Discussions-To and Post-History

cc @pradyunsg @rgommers @mgorny @msarahan


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4572.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0804/

jaimergp and others added 2 commits September 3, 2025 11:52
Co-authored-by: Pradyun Gedam <pradyunsg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: rgommers <ralf.gommers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: mgorny <mgorny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike Sarahan <msarahan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pradyun Gedam <pradyunsg@gmail.com>
@python-cla-bot
Copy link

python-cla-bot bot commented Sep 3, 2025

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

CLA signed

@jaimergp jaimergp marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2025 10:02
@jaimergp jaimergp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2025 10:02
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
@brianschubert brianschubert added the new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review label Sep 3, 2025
@rgommers
Copy link
Contributor

Can I ask about whether this PEP can be merged soon, unless there are more editorial comments? It'd be nice to have draft versions of this PEP as well as the next PEP 725 version (which depends on this PR) up and start the discussion on Discourse.

@pradyunsg pradyunsg merged commit 745095c into python:main Sep 17, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants