Skip to content

Conversation

@encukou
Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou commented Jun 11, 2025

I intended these to be further reading, but since they're specifications, people might assume that Python is conformant. It is not. (Formally, we don't even pass the very first point of TR55's checklist -- “An implementation claiming conformance to this specification shall identify the version of this specification.”)

@miketheman, does this clear things up?


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4460.org.readthedocs.build/

Copy link
Member

@miketheman miketheman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this clarification makes it more explicit that the reference is just reference material.

@encukou encukou merged commit 1c806bb into python:main Jun 11, 2025
6 checks passed
@encukou encukou deleted the pep-672-disclaimer branch June 11, 2025 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants