Skip to content

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented May 24, 2025

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4438.org.readthedocs.build/

@hugovk hugovk requested a review from facundobatista as a code owner May 24, 2025 09:39
@facundobatista facundobatista merged commit ae06297 into python:main May 26, 2025
6 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep769-mark-as-rejected branch May 26, 2025 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants