Skip to content

Conversation

@emmatyping
Copy link
Member

@emmatyping emmatyping commented May 24, 2025

  • Final implementation has been merged (including tests and docs)
  • PEP matches the final implementation
  • Any substantial changes since the accepted version approved by the SC/PEP delegate
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Final)
  • Status changed to Final (and Python-Version is correct)
  • Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
    (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
    or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4436.org.readthedocs.build/

@emmatyping emmatyping requested a review from gpshead as a code owner May 24, 2025 04:04
Copy link
Contributor

@willingc willingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congrats @emmatyping!

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented May 24, 2025

  • Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
    (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
    or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

Please add canonical-doc to link to compression.zstd and/or compression.

@emmatyping
Copy link
Member Author

Please add canonical-doc to link to compression.zstd and/or compression.

Done. I misunderstood the prompt, I thought this only applied to things where there was a living spec like packaging/typing. Thanks for clarifying!

Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@gpshead gpshead merged commit b8a7cb6 into python:main May 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@emmatyping emmatyping deleted the mark-pep-784-final branch May 24, 2025 04:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants