PEP 749: Mark as Accepted

[JelleZijlstra]

• SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
• Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
• Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
• Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
• Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
• Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

cc @warsaw

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4406.org.readthedocs.build/

[h-vetinari]

Congratulations on the acceptance of the PEP! 🥳

While reading again I noticed a small issue:

peps/peps/pep-0749.rst

Lines 878 to 880 in a9f1b15

	See `python/cpython#130907`__ for implementation.
	__ https://github.com/python/cpython/issue/130907

For one, that link is not working (would need to be /issues/ not /issue/), but more importantly, that issue does not actually discuss the implementation, or rather: the actual implementation ended up not doing the behaviour change implied by the write-up in the issue, but rather kept 3.13 behaviour.

[JelleZijlstra]

Good catch, I'll change the link to the PR with what I ended up implementing.

[h-vetinari]

This is perhaps not important anymore now that the PEP is accepted, but you might want to change this sentence, given that the "obviously unintuitive" behaviour is now what PEP 749 implements.

[JelleZijlstra]

It's not what's currently implemented.