Skip to content

Conversation

@Gerardwx
Copy link
Contributor

@Gerardwx Gerardwx commented Apr 4, 2025

Document SC rejection.

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4346.org.readthedocs.build/

@Gerardwx Gerardwx requested a review from Rosuav as a code owner April 4, 2025 16:46
@carljm

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Rosuav
Copy link
Contributor

Rosuav commented Apr 4, 2025

PEP 736 (/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pep-previews/checkouts/4346/peps/pep-0736.rst): Rejected  is not a valid Status value

Is there possibly a space after the word Rejected?

Meta-note: Can (and should) the parser be made more permissive in this area?

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra changed the title Rejected by steering council PEP 736: Rejected by steering council Apr 4, 2025
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title PEP 736: Rejected by steering council PEP 736: Mark as Rejected Apr 4, 2025
@corona10 corona10 merged commit 12925da into python:main Apr 14, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants