Skip to content

Conversation

@skirpichev
Copy link
Contributor

@skirpichev skirpichev commented Dec 9, 2024

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution link points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4159.org.readthedocs.build/

@skirpichev skirpichev requested a review from vstinner as a code owner December 9, 2024 00:49
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on your first accepted PEP! 🎉

@vstinner vstinner merged commit 108d330 into python:main Dec 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@skirpichev skirpichev deleted the pep757-edits branch December 9, 2024 10:07
gvanrossum pushed a commit to gvanrossum/peps that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
* Remove implementation details from  PyLongExport docs

* Set PEP 757 status to Accepted

Co-authored-by: Alyssa Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants