Skip to content

PEP 387: Suggest waiting 5 years before removing a deprecated feature #4156

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
brettcannon merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

PEP 387: Suggest waiting 5 years before removing a deprecated feature #4156

brettcannon merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

@brettcannon brettcannon commented Dec 5, 2024 •
edited by gpshead
Loading

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4156.org.readthedocs.build/

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

brettcannon commented Dec 5, 2024

Draft PR at the request of the SC.

@brettcannon brettcannon mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Closed
@gpshead gpshead marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 21:25
@corona10
Copy link
Member

corona10 commented Jan 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

SC approved this PEP at today's meeting. :)

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 36b3b39 into python:main Jan 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@brettcannon brettcannon deleted the pep387-5_years branch January 27, 2025 20:38
@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Feb 14, 2025

Should we mention this in the PEP's changelog?

https://peps.python.org/pep-0387/#changelog

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

brettcannon commented Feb 18, 2025

Should we mention this in the PEP's changelog?

https://peps.python.org/pep-0387/#changelog

I'll do a PR this week. Thanks for noticing the oversight! 😅

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

brettcannon commented Feb 20, 2025

@hugovk #4279

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@warsaw warsaw warsaw approved these changes

@corona10 corona10 corona10 approved these changes

@benjaminp benjaminp Awaiting requested review from benjaminp benjaminp is a code owner

@vstinner vstinner Awaiting requested review from vstinner vstinner is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@brettcannon @corona10 @hugovk @warsaw @gpshead