Skip to content

PEP 765: add discussion link, tweak one sentence #4120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
iritkatriel merged 5 commits into from
Nov 16, 2024
Merged

PEP 765: add discussion link, tweak one sentence #4120

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f7283bd
PEP 765: add discussion link
iritkatriel Nov 16, 2024
44b03c4
tweak sentence
iritkatriel Nov 16, 2024
7a76c0f
typo
iritkatriel Nov 16, 2024
b719713
whitespace
iritkatriel Nov 16, 2024
344673a
Apply suggestions from code review
iritkatriel Nov 16, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions peps/pep-0765.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
PEP: 765
Title: Disallow return/break/continue that exit a finally block
Author: Irit Katriel <irit@python.org>, Alyssa Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/an-analysis-of-return-in-finally-in-the-wild/70633
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-765-disallow-return-break-continue-that-exit-a-finally-block/71348
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Created: 15-Nov-2024
Python-Version: 3.14
Post-History: `09-Nov-2024 <https://discuss.python.org/t/an-analysis-of-return-in-finally-in-the-wild/70633>`__,
`16-Nov-2024 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-765-disallow-return-break-continue-that-exit-a-finally-block/71348>`__,

Abstract
========
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ A recent `analysis of real world code
This new data indicates that it would benefit Python's users if
Python itself moved them away from this harmful feature.

`One of the arguments brought up
One of the arguments brought up in `the PEP 601 discussion
<https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-601-forbid-return-break-continue-breaking-out-of-finally/2239/24>`__
was that language features should be orthogonal, and combine without
context-based restrictions. However, in the meantime :pep:`654` has
Expand Down