Skip to content

Conversation

@sethmlarson
Copy link
Contributor

@sethmlarson sethmlarson commented Nov 6, 2024

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution link points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4113.org.readthedocs.build/

@sethmlarson sethmlarson requested a review from hugovk as a code owner November 6, 2024 19:06
@hugovk hugovk changed the title PEP 761: Mark as Accepted PEP 761: Mark as Active Nov 6, 2024
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 4405f76 into python:main Nov 6, 2024
3 checks passed
@sethmlarson sethmlarson deleted the pep-761-active branch November 6, 2024 19:20
gvanrossum pushed a commit to gvanrossum/peps that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants