Skip to content

feat(annotated): clarify and improve mutex groups#1693

Draft
KelvinChung2000 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/annotated-mutex-in-group
Draft

feat(annotated): clarify and improve mutex groups#1693
KelvinChung2000 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/annotated-mutex-in-group

Conversation

@KelvinChung2000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

close #1687

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (2a9eee9) to head (c77f55b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1693      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.57%   99.59%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        5681     5712      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits         5657     5689      +32     
+ Misses         24       23       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.59% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Intended way to define a mutually exclusive group inside a normal argument group with with_annotated

1 participant