Skip to content

Conversation

@AntoxaAntoxic
Copy link
Collaborator

🔧 Type of changes

  • new bid adapter
  • bid adapter update
  • new feature
  • new analytics adapter
  • new module
  • module update
  • bugfix
  • documentation
  • configuration
  • dependency update
  • tech debt (test coverage, refactorings, etc.)

✨ What's the context?

prebid/prebid-server#3965

🧠 Rationale behind the change

Why did you choose to make these changes? Were there any trade-offs you had to consider?

🔎 New Bid Adapter Checklist

  • verify email contact works
  • NO fully dynamic hostnames
  • geographic host parameters are NOT required
  • direct use of HTTP is prohibited - implement an existing Bidder interface that will do all the job
  • if the ORTB is just forwarded to the endpoint, use the generic adapter - define the new adapter as the alias of the generic adapter
  • cover an adapter configuration with an integration test

🧪 Test plan

How do you know the changes are safe to ship to production?

🏎 Quality check

  • Are your changes following our code style guidelines?
  • Are there any breaking changes in your code?
  • Does your test coverage exceed 90%?
  • Are there any erroneous console logs, debuggers or leftover code in your changes?

@AntoxaAntoxic AntoxaAntoxic self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
@osulzhenko osulzhenko requested a review from CTMBNara January 7, 2025 09:30
CTMBNara
CTMBNara previously approved these changes Jan 7, 2025
* Increase tests coverage for bidder-specific tmax
@CTMBNara CTMBNara merged commit ba33fac into master Jan 8, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@CTMBNara CTMBNara deleted the bidder-specific-tmax branch January 8, 2025 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants