Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 15 additions & 10 deletions Zend/zend_inheritance.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1580,17 +1580,21 @@ static void do_inherit_property(zend_property_info *parent_info, zend_string *ke
}
/* }}} */

static inline void do_implement_interface(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *iface) /* {{{ */
static inline void do_implement_interface_ex(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *inherited_face, zend_class_entry *base_iface)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Inconsistent naming, face vs. iface. I also find the names confusing. With the name do_implement_interface_ex, it's not clear which interface is being implelmented.

{
if (!(ce->ce_flags & ZEND_ACC_INTERFACE) && iface->interface_gets_implemented && iface->interface_gets_implemented(iface, ce) == FAILURE) {
zend_error_noreturn(E_CORE_ERROR, "%s %s could not implement interface %s", zend_get_object_type_uc(ce), ZSTR_VAL(ce->name), ZSTR_VAL(iface->name));
if (!(ce->ce_flags & ZEND_ACC_INTERFACE) && inherited_face->interface_gets_implemented && inherited_face->interface_gets_implemented(base_iface, ce) == FAILURE) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this correct? interface_gets_implemented() should be able to validate if an inteface can be implemented, but if we only pass the base_iface, we'll miss validation for the actual inherited interface. E.g. will this break if UnitEnum is added to a class implicitly through an inherited interface?

Is this change needed at all?

zend_error_noreturn(E_CORE_ERROR, "%s %s could not implement interface %s", zend_get_object_type_uc(ce), ZSTR_VAL(ce->name), ZSTR_VAL(base_iface->name));
}
/* This should be prevented by the class lookup logic. */
ZEND_ASSERT(ce != iface);
ZEND_ASSERT(ce != base_iface);
}

static inline void do_implement_interface(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *iface)
{
do_implement_interface_ex(ce, iface, iface);
}
Comment on lines +1592 to 1595
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need the _ex? distinction? The function is static and only used 2 times from what I see.

/* }}} */

static void zend_do_inherit_interfaces(zend_class_entry *ce, const zend_class_entry *iface) /* {{{ */
static void zend_do_inherit_interfaces(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *iface) /* {{{ */
{
/* expects interface to be contained in ce's interface list already */
uint32_t i, ce_num, if_num = iface->num_interfaces;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1619,7 +1623,7 @@ static void zend_do_inherit_interfaces(zend_class_entry *ce, const zend_class_en

/* and now call the implementing handlers */
while (ce_num < ce->num_interfaces) {
do_implement_interface(ce, ce->interfaces[ce_num++]);
do_implement_interface_ex(ce, ce->interfaces[ce_num++], iface);
}
}
/* }}} */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2169,6 +2173,10 @@ static void do_interface_implementation(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *
zend_class_constant *c;
uint32_t flags = ZEND_INHERITANCE_CHECK_PROTO | ZEND_INHERITANCE_CHECK_VISIBILITY;

if (iface->num_interfaces) {
zend_do_inherit_interfaces(ce, iface);
}

if (!(ce->ce_flags & ZEND_ACC_INTERFACE)) {
/* We are not setting the prototype of overridden interface methods because of abstract
* constructors. See Zend/tests/interface_constructor_prototype_001.phpt. */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2200,9 +2208,6 @@ static void do_interface_implementation(zend_class_entry *ce, zend_class_entry *
} ZEND_HASH_FOREACH_END();

do_implement_interface(ce, iface);
if (iface->num_interfaces) {
zend_do_inherit_interfaces(ce, iface);
}
}
/* }}} */

Expand Down