feat: access adapter removal , for address_space !=4

[Maillew]

• feature branch for removal of access-adapters, since there are a lot of needed changes, and one PR was getting messy

Closes INT-5621

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 83.18%

_{Comparing feat/access-adapter-removal (6b04b45) with develop-v1.6.0 (6dc3800)¹}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

❌ 8 regressed benchmarks
✅ 16 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 36 skipped benchmarks²

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[keccak256]	11.1 ms	47.7 ms	-76.72%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[revm_snailtracer]	7.3 ms	43.6 ms	-83.18%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[fibonacci_recursive]	16.9 ms	53.7 ms	-68.48%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[revm_transfer]	24.9 ms	60.6 ms	-58.9%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[quicksort]	9 ms	45.7 ms	-80.24%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[fibonacci_iterative]	14.3 ms	50.3 ms	-71.52%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[bubblesort]	11.3 ms	47.7 ms	-76.41%
❌	WallTime	benchmark_execute_metered[sha256]	9.3 ms	45.3 ms	-79.46%

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on develop-v1.6.0 (95b9cdf) during the generation of this report, so 95fdcd5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 36 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩