-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
[multiple] Move cifmw_basedir var to group_vars #3451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[multiple] Move cifmw_basedir var to group_vars #3451
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
recheck |
|
Merge Failed. This change or one of its cross-repo dependencies was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of its repository. Please rebase the change and upload a new patchset. |
24bfe97 to
214c377
Compare
214c377 to
2290d71
Compare
|
Is there any possibility of encountering breaking errors when the cifmw_basedir is not defined? I see you mentioned there is cases where it is intentionally unset but how well are these cases handled? |
2290d71 to
5fe4d10
Compare
|
@brjackma if the var is not defined, it means the parent task/playbook needs to be changed. Ansible needs to read the group_vars. |
Pull request done just to verify all related PRs. Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators#3451 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators#3454 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators#3455 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators#3456
|
recheck |
|
recheck |
d8ff45f to
9e962b7
Compare
9e962b7 to
2261ed4
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The `cifmw_basedir` variable is now expected to be defined group_vars. Previous fallback to `ansible_user_dir ~ '/ci-framework-data'` has been removed from playbooks and roles. This change ensures consistency across roles and prevents accidental use of a default path when `cifmw_basedir` is intentionally unset. Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
The `cifmw_basedir` variable is now expected to be defined group_vars. Previous fallback to `ansible_user_dir ~ '/ci-framework-data'` has been removed from playbooks and roles. This change ensures consistency across roles and prevents accidental use of a default path when `cifmw_basedir` is intentionally unset. This commit is one of a set of changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
The `cifmw_basedir` variable is now expected to be defined group_vars. Previous fallback to `ansible_user_dir ~ '/ci-framework-data'` has been removed from playbooks and roles. This change ensures consistency across roles and prevents accidental use of a default path when `cifmw_basedir` is intentionally unset. This commit is one part of a set of changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
The `cifmw_basedir` variable is now expected to be defined group_vars. Previous fallback to `ansible_user_dir ~ '/ci-framework-data'` has been removed from playbooks and roles. This change ensures consistency across roles and prevents accidental use of a default path when `cifmw_basedir` is intentionally unset. This commit is one part of a set of changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
2261ed4 to
b50d41c
Compare
|
recheck |
|
recheck |
|
recheck |
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/4e16a13e256342f1a3087234447ad7ff ❌ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider NODE_FAILURE Node request 100-0008119458 failed in 0s |
|
recheck |
|
recheck |
|
This PR is stale because it has been for over 15 days with no activity. |
The
cifmw_basedirvariable is now expected to be defined group_vars.Previous fallback to
ansible_user_dir ~ '/ci-framework-data'has beenremoved from playbooks and roles.
This change ensures consistency across roles and prevents accidental use
of a default path when
cifmw_basediris intentionally unset.This commit is one part of a set of changes.
NOTE:
Probably this commit would be split into few pull requests.
More: OSPRH-20491
Depends-On: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/58488