Skip to content

Conversation

@fserucas
Copy link

@fserucas fserucas commented Oct 25, 2024

No description provided.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rebtoor for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

This change depends on a change with an invalid configuration.

@github-actions
Copy link

Thanks for the PR! ❤️
I'm marking it as a draft, once your happy with it merging and the PR is passing CI, click the "Ready for review" button below.

@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft October 25, 2024 12:45
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Hi @fserucas. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openstack-k8s-operators member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@fserucas
Copy link
Author

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Zuul encountered a syntax error while parsing its
configuration in the repo openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework on branch 18.0.0-proposed. The
problem was:

Nodeset centos-9-multinode-rhel-9-2-crc-extracted-2-39-0-3xl-novacells does not match existing definition in branch main

The problem appears in the the "centos-9-multinode-rhel-9-2-crc-extracted-2-39-0-3xl-novacells" nodeset stanza:

nodeset:
name: centos-9-multinode-rhel-9-2-crc-extracted-2-39-0-3xl-novacells
nodes:
- name: controller
label: cloud-centos-9-stream-tripleo
- name: crc
label: coreos-crc-extracted-2-39-0-3xl
- name: undercloud
label: cloud-rhel-9-2-tripleo
...

in "openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework/zuul.d/nodeset.yaml@18.0.0-proposed", line 150

@fserucas
Copy link
Author

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

This change depends on a change with an invalid configuration.

@fserucas-org fserucas-org closed this by deleting the head repository Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants