Skip to content

Conversation

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor

@bandrade bandrade commented Dec 4, 2025

Migrate non-deprecated bandrade QE cases from openshift-tests-private into the OLMv0 test extension

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bandrade
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelanford for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

bandrade commented Dec 4, 2025

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@bandrade: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1e903510-d0e9-11f0-811a-7c7efa004e2c-0

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

Hi @bandrade , any updates? Thanks!

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @bandrade , any updates? Thanks!

Hey @jianzhangbjz it's ready for another review /cc @kuiwang02

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/0e009dd0-d629-11f0-811d-e77017aae448-0

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

Hi @bandrade , any updates for the latest comments? Thanks!

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2025

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/106ba080-ded3-11f0-8425-8d818cb74854-0

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/d624dfa0-df94-11f0-89e5-2c9308a5921a-0

@bandrade bandrade force-pushed the bandrade-olmv0-ote-migration branch from fbab94b to f54ee1a Compare December 24, 2025 00:50
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 24, 2025

@bandrade: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-images f54ee1a link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn f54ee1a link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/tests-extension f54ee1a link true /test tests-extension
ci/prow/unit-olm f54ee1a link true /test unit-olm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

Hi @bandrade , please take a look at this failure https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-operator-framework-olm-1169-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1/2002909686503837696

: [sig-operator][Jira:OLM] OLMv0 should PolarionID:24916-[OTP][Skipped:Disconnected]Operators in AllNamespaces should be granted namespace list expand_less | 18s
-- | --
{  fail [/build/tests-extension/test/qe/specs/olmv0_common.go:894]: The namespaces of the OperatorGroup status is incorrect. It should contain all namespaces, but got: ["e2e-test-default-9q8w7"]}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants