OSDOCS-16473 Ingress controller route timeout configurable variables …#106920
OSDOCS-16473 Ingress controller route timeout configurable variables …#106920jmanthei wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/M
jmanthei
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16374
branch
from
ecad97f to
7ccfa3a
Compare
jmanthei
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16374
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e049e62 to
b308dc1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.TaskContents: The '.Procedure' block title is missing.
| [role="_abstract"] | ||
| To manage connection durations and optimize performance of your Ingress Controller, you can configure router timeout variables. These variables control how long the router waits for client responses, server data, or established connections before closing them. | ||
|
|
||
| .Configuring a router timeout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.TaskTitle: Unsupported titles cannot be mapped to DITA tasks.
| [role="_abstract"] | ||
| To manage connection durations and optimize performance of your Ingress Controller, you can configure router timeout variables. These variables control how long the router waits for client responses, server data, or established connections before closing them. | ||
|
|
||
| .Configuring a router timeout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.BlockTitle: Block titles can only be assigned to examples, figures, and tables in DITA.
|
|
||
| |=== | ||
|
|
||
| .A route setting custom timeout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.TaskTitle: Unsupported titles cannot be mapped to DITA tasks.
| haproxy.router.openshift.io/timeout: 5500ms <1> | ||
| ... | ||
| ---- | ||
| <1> Specifies the new timeout with HAProxy supported units (`us`, `ms`, `s`, `m`, `h`, `d`). If the unit is not provided, `ms` is the default. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.CalloutList: Callouts are not supported in DITA.
…table placed in correct section
jmanthei
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16374
branch
from
ed9feef to
e301de5
Compare
|
@jmanthei: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
3 participants
…table placed in correct section
Version(s): 4.12+
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16374
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
Additional information: