-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
IIC-763 Ignore iputils when installing nmcli as it is a weak dep #490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Hi @saynb. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
as of now, CI doesn't rebuild the changes that you're proposing here, so it's not testing the changes. We need to hash the dockerfile in it's entirety and then don't do an incremental build in case the hash changes. https://github.com/openshift/dpu-operator/blob/main/taskfiles/images.yaml#L26-L45 |
@bn222 I added an extra line in the dockerfile to force a rebuild. It worked locally for me so hopefully it will work here too. The solution that you are asking for here, that seems like keeping and maintaining computed hash of the dockerfile locally? Is that common practice? Seems like an involved change. How does the incremental vs full build get differentiated today? |
|
Can someone please give an ok-to-test on this so that we can see if it is being triggered ? |
|
/ok-to-test |
please fix the incremental build logic. It doesn't rebuild if you make a change to the dockerfile. |
What about this? |
|
First build is complete, any new build is incremental regardless of what the dockerfile contains. |
Signed-off-by: Sayan Bandyopadhyay <sayan.bandyopadhyay@intel.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saynb The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
@saynb: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
No description provided.