OCPBUGS-77016: fix type as K8sResourceKind assertion in createKnatifyPage

[cajieh]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Improved internal code structure and type definitions in the Knative plugin component to enhance maintainability.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cajieh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77016, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cajieh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [cajieh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CreateKnatifyPage component was refactored to improve type safety and clarity. The dynamic-plugin-sdk imports were refined by removing the unused WatchK8sResultsObject type while retaining WatchK8sResults and useActivePerspective. The watchResource type definition was changed from a generic index signature pattern to explicit public fields with proper typing for projects, imageStream, and optional workloadResource. The KnatifyForm invocation was simplified by passing projects directly without unnecessary type casting to WatchK8sResultsObject or fallback empty object handling.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly references the specific bug (OCPBUGS-77016) and accurately describes the main change—fixing a type assertion to K8sResourceKind in createKnatifyPage, which aligns with the refactored watchResource type and simplified type handling in the diff.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cajieh]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cajieh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77016, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@cajieh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.