OCPBUGS-61949: Remove references to cluster-api-operator image#384
Conversation
|
@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
WalkthroughRemoved the cluster-kube-cluster-api-operator image entry across three locations: dev-images.json, the cluster-capi-operator-images ConfigMap data (images.json), and the image stream tags in manifests/image-references. No other keys, structures, or tags were altered. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
/test ? |
|
@damdo: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs: The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs: Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/test regression-clusterinfra-aws-ipi-techpreview-capi |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: damdo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/verified bypass No need for formal QE verification on this |
|
@damdo: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/unhold |
|
/hold |
|
/jira refresh The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity. |
|
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Replaced by #444 |
|
@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira-refresh |
|
@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/hold cancel |
|
/verified bypass |
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@mdbooth: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@mdbooth: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61949 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 |
|
@mdbooth: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/cluster-capi-operator#release-4.22 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-384-to-release-4.22: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"No commits between openshift:release-4.22 and openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-384-to-release-4.22"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request","status":"422"} DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.21 |
|
@mdbooth: new pull request created: #445 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.22.0-0.nightly-2026-01-19-085729 |
Summary by CodeRabbit